|
| You have been cleared. | central command | make contact | |
 Blogging under the patronage of
 Subscribe to Dossier Updates!  Temporary Motto: Let me tell you something about humans, nephew. They're a wonderful, friendly people . . . as long as their bellies are full and their holosuites are working. But take away their creature comforts, deprive them of food, sleep, sonic showers . . . put their lives in jeopardy over an extended period of time . . . and those same intelligent, friendly, wonderful people will become as nasty, and as violent, as the most bloodthirsty Klingon. -- Quark, Star Trek: Deep Space 9, "Siege of AR-558" 
 Previous Dispatches Yaps, Fisks & Streams of Consciousness Matters Catholic A Papist's Potpourri
 Complete Archive
Reviews "The Porterhouse Steak of the Blogosphere. . . [O]ne of the great undiscovered essayists of our times . . . has my vote as a prose stylist of genius." -- Mark Shea "Why do you write at such length? Who can read such long screeds?" -- Pavel C in ? "You are a treasure, Secret Agent Man." -- Fr. Brian Stanley "I wish I had time to read all that, but I don't -- Fr. Bill Vath "Your blogging is simply unreadable." -- BF in Texas. "[O]ne of my favorite Catholic writers today." -- Dave Armstrong "I couldn't even read the whole thing, SAM." -- Geoff Horton "Gloriously funny and on the mark. You are a credit to the medium." -- Otto Hiss "I enjoy your blog (except for the strange, long, rambling, weird entries)." -- John K. "You elegantly mix sarcasm with real political/moral clear thinking." -- Dr. Peter Frey  Safehouses
Catholic and Enjoying It  Online Sources Dave Armstrong'sBiblical Evidence for Catholicism Joe Gallegos' Corunum Apologetics Website The Ever-Helpful New Advent The Adoremus Website The Fathers of Mercy The Diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska 749 Catholic Prayers Farrell's Companion to the Summa Papal Encyclicals Net Documents of the Council of Trent Catechism of the Catholic Church Catechism of St. Pius X The Holy Bible (Douai-Rhiems Version) The Holy Bible (KJV & RSV) Ron Rychlak's Hitler, the War & the Pope Web Gallery A Virtual Museum of Art Chiniquy Debunked  2
Notices & Policies Any and all correspondence with the Dossier or its proprietor is presumed to be eligible for blogging and will be so used, in whole or in edited form as the proprietor may see fit, unless a request to the contrary is made in the correspondence which would otherwise be eligible for blogging. (Tell me at the time, not after you've blown up over what I did with your email). Matter eligible for blogging may be later used, altered, and re-used by the Dossier' proprietor as he may see fit.
Commentary about, or linking to, any website, weblog, or essay by the Dossier is to be understood (in the absence of other context) only as the proprietor's limited approval of the material as and to the extent identified. Neither the Dossier nor its proprietor wholly, entirely, and slavishly endorse any views or persons, except the following: People Who Are Canonized: The Great Mother of God Mary Most Holy, Joseph her most chaste spouse, Dismas, Peter, Paul, Simon de Montfort, John of God, Thomas the Apostle, Thomas Aquinas, Thomas More, Thomas Beckett, Veronica, Boniface, Maria Goretti, Luigi Quatrocchi, Alphonsus Ligouri, Theresa of Avila, Therese of the Child Jesus, Pius X, Pius V, and all the rest of them; People Who Definitely Ought to be Canonized: His Holiness John Paul II, Vicar of Christ, Pius IX, Pius XII, Leo XIII, Innocent III, Nicholas I, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Rafael Cardinal Merry del Val, John Henry Cardinal Newman, Bishop Fulton Sheen, Frank Duff, Christopher Dawson, Richard M. Weaver, Heinrich Rommen, Jaques Maritain, Deitrich von Hildebrand, Hillaire Belloc, John C. Calhoun, James Longstreet, and Robert E. Lee; People Who Will Probably Be Canonized Someday: Mark Shea, I. Shawn McElhinney, Gary Hoge, and E.L. Core (of course, the blanket and slavish endorsement as to these persons is valid only to the extent they're not disagreeing with me); People Who, If Not Yet Saints, Are Definitely Being Persecuted for His Sake: Any Christian whose orthodox theological or disciplinary views are impugned by a television network, National Public Radio, the New York Times, America or the National Catholic Reporter; and, lastly, things which are . . . Ontologically Incapable of Sainthood, but Still Endorsed The P-47 Thunderbolt, the F8 Crusader, the A-10 Warthog and its 30mm gatling gun, Hecker & Koch rifles, NCAA Division III football, Countess Mara ties (with logo), MacBarren's Pipe Tobacco (especially Virginian No. 1), Samuel Gawith Pipe Tobaccos (especially Best Brown Flake), Peterson pipes, Hoyo de Monterrey cigars, Krohn Vintage Port, and my dog Auggie.
SecretAgentMan's Dossier is copyrighted, except with regard to linked or quoted material as may be necessary for the owners thereof to retain all rights, because property is sacred. Permission is given to link to any part of this weblog until I get upset over your doing it. Original content may be reproduced and distributed with my permission, so just email me because I'm very easygoing. SecretAgentMan's Dossier Copyright 2003 Ian A.T. McLean.
1. Tiepolo, Giovanni / Visipix.com 2. Photograph subject to GNU Free Documentation License A copy of the License may be found at the link and is incorported here by reference. The License applies to the photograph without changes or added conditions whatsoever. Blog Design by Christopher Blosser |
Sunday, January 29, 2006
Lines from a Political Speech I believe that the people are citizens who own a continuing and responsible role in their own government, not sheep who are asked to bleat from time to time in answer to the prospect of the shepherds and the wolves changing places once again. How long will we go on with this relentless puttering, this engless timid niggling, changing everything just a little, so as to keep everything just the same? Transmitted by SecretAgentMan 23:58 Hours [+] |  Saturday, January 28, 2006
Adjusting Muslim Culture Via Relapsed Catholic, we learn that Al-Jazeera is angry at a Danish newspaper's contest for offensive cartoons about Muhammad. At the end of the article -- after Al-Jazeera has documented the disgusting unwillingness of the Danish government to "take action" against the offenders, and worries that the contest will spark a new crop of anti-Islamic mobs slaughtering Muslims in the streets of the West -- we're treated to the standard Mark1Mod0 Moral Superiority Tag-Line: "The Islamic religion does not allow offensive remarks by both Muslims and Non-Muslims." By both? That's an interesting turn of phrase. One wonders if it might be called a "Dhimmian slip." I wonder, since it appears that Islam allows offensive remarks to be made by Muslims, who take full advantage of the privilege: Like this.There are other interesting Dhimmian slips in this article, such as the headline: "Has Defaming the Prophet become ‘Freedom of Speech?'" As though we must all agree that some universal law has already been passed requiring everyone to admit that Muhammad actually was a prophet. Al-Jazeera says "the Qur'an, the Muslims' holy book orders them to conduct discussions in an orderly and respectable manner. It prohibits ridiculing the Jews/Christians or the Prophets." I have no doubt that the anti-Semitic authors and cartoonists who fill Muslim media with vile and hateful images of Jews believe they're not ridiculing anyone and that their behavior is orderly and respectable. After all, if Jews really are the moral equivalent of Nazis, the hooky-nosed secret dominators of the world, who make matzos from the blood of gentile children, then surely it's respectable and orderly to point that out. So, welcome to the world of secular liberty, kids, where opinions are like . . . er, uh . . . ubiquitous, and where smugly claiming to "tolerate respectable opinions" is as much of an answer to the problem of free speech as saying "we only shoot the bad people" is an answer to the problem of how best to enforce the law. I don't like newspapers mocking Islam any more than I like them mocking Christianity. But if I used Al-Jazeera's yardstick to measure things, then every time a Muslim refers to "Isa" a/ka "Jesus," as a prophet I'd have to conclude that he's violating the "basic right" of my true faith to be recognized as the true faith. When Islamic scholars paint the crusades as nothing but a series of imperialist war crimes, they're "insulting" my culture. And apparently I must demand that they be punished; if the police should be used to "ensure respect" for Muslim immigrants, surely the police can be used to "ensure respect" for Christian non-immigrants. The result of that perspective is civil war, as Christians and Muslims fight to control the state in order to "ensure respect" for our true faiths. It's the paradigm that drove the West into secularism to begin with, and I haven't seen anything suggesting that Islam has a better alternative. It's been claimed that Islam offers true tolerance, the dawn of a golden age when common values can shared without exclusion or oppression. Al-Jazeera's petulant editorial indicates that Islam has a lot of adjustment to do before it can prosper outside of a Muttawa-maintained hothouse of double standards and seething grievances. Transmitted by SecretAgentMan 15:03 Hours [+] | Friday, January 27, 2006
The Waiter . . . Again The Waiter at Waiter Rant is a good guy. Chief clue: His first reaction to a holy inspiration is to curse. Now I know that the man who is not tempted to desist from charity enjoys a nobler character of soul than the man who is, but I have a lot of fellow-feeling for guys who have to grind the gears, so to speak, before making their guardian angels happy. BTW, The Waiter has also been nominated for Best American Blog. Go vote for him. As to the slim offerings here, it's been busy. A post on "robust questioning" will appear in a few days, hopefully. Transmitted by SecretAgentMan 21:33 Hours [+] | Tuesday, January 24, 2006
I'm Waiting . . . . . Now that Google has agreed to become an arm of the Chinese police state, I'm wondering when that cute little tank-and-pedestrian graphic will appear as garnish on the Google logo. Tianmen Square Day, perhaps? Transmitted by SecretAgentMan 23:55 Hours [+] | Friday, January 20, 2006
Another Empty Suit Sen. Hillary Clinton called for United Nations sanctions against Iran and faulted the Bush administration for "downplaying" the threat Tehran's nuclear program poses. In other words, Hillary Clinton has rebuked the President for ignoring a serious problem by proposing, herself, that we continue to ignore a serious problem. She was probably eligible a long time ago, but in my book she's officially down as an Empty Suit. Transmitted by SecretAgentMan 16:56 Hours [+] | Sunday, January 15, 2006
Transmitted by SecretAgentMan 03:00 Hours [+] | Sunday, January 08, 2006
Favorite Fight Scenes Here are some of my favorite movie fight scenes in no particular order: Giant . . . Bic Benedict vs. "Sarge" in Sarge's Diner. They Live . . . "Nada" vs. "Frank" in the alleyway. Bad Day at Black Rock . . . McCreedy vs. Coley in Sam's Bar & Grill. Gardens of Stone St. Hazard vs. Angelica Huston's boyfriend at the cocktail party. The Duellists, D'Hubert vs. Ferraud (Round II, fought in the Stables) Aliens, Ripley vs. the Queen The Princess Bride, Westley vs. Inigo Montoya The Matrix Neo vs. Agent Smith Fists of Fury Cheng-Chao An vs. Yin-Chieh Han Rocky, Rocky Balboa vs. Apollo Creed Brotherhood of the Wolfe, Mani vs. Gypsy Thugs Blade Blade vs. Everybody in the Vampire Club Predator, "Dutch" Schaeffer vs. the Predator The Challenge, Rick Murphy vs. Hideo The Godfather, Santino Corleone vs. Carlo Rizzi Hard Times, Cheney vs. Jim Henry A Bronx Tale, Mobsters vs. Bikers From Russia With Love, James Bond vs. Grant Raiders of the Lost Ark, Indiana Jones vs. Giant Bald Nazi The Adventures of Robin Hood, Robin Hood vs. Sir Guy of Guisborne The Quiet Man, Sean Thornton vs. Squire Danaher Monty Python and the Holy Grail, King Arthur vs. Black Knight Rob Roy, Rob Roy v. Archibald Cunningham Troy, Achilles v. Hector One which isn't on the list is "Saving Private Ryan, Pvt. Mellish vs. German Infantryman." That's not a "fight scene." It's terrifying and the first piece of art I've seen that viscerally suggests to me the obscenity of war. But it's not an entertaining "fight scene" so it's not on the list. Transmitted by SecretAgentMan 21:22 Hours [+] | Friday, January 06, 2006
Discussion of Iraq Rerum Novarum and I have agreed to argue about the war in Iraq. I have my own arguments and Shawn, in a pleasing mixture of good sportsmanship and supreme overconfidence, has offered to send me some thoughts of his own in that regard to see what use I might make of them in my own cause. It may be some time before this develops, but I'll be glad to finally put up a full account of why I don't think we should have attacked Iraq. Transmitted by SecretAgentMan 17:32 Hours [+] |
|
